Reflecting on a moral problem ( affirmative action) Essay

Reflecting on a moral problem ( affirmative activity) - Essay grammatical caseOther countries similarly enlightened adopted the resembling principles of this affirmative exertion law but termed it differently, much(prenominal) as positive discrimination in the United Kingdom in which discrimination was given a positive and beneficial connotation or in Canada where it is c onlyed as employment equity to mean e very(prenominal)body has fit chances at getting employed if a person has the same qualities, qualifications, credentials, and capabilities as another person. In all these countries, the main idea was to take positive action that will adaptedize everybody. In reference to the Womens kindling Movement (or feminism for short), the same laws in principle were adopted and likewise applied to women to have the same opportunities as men. Some countries adopted a different system altogether such as utilise quotas to allocate a certain number of slots to members of some minority classifys. The same idea of affirmative action was soon introduced to schools and universities in admitting students for enrollment. In this paper, it will be argued how procedural affirmative action is the better of the devil variants. ... The only remaining criterion for a job appli tusht is his or her qualifications for the position. In a sense, this freshman side of affirmative action is negatively stated, that to achieve the noble aims of affirmative action, any employer should ignore the applicants race, creed, or colour in. This first side is what is straightway called as the procedural affirmative action (Cahn 14). On the other hand, the mho side is now more nuanced as it carefully takes into its consideration the very things which were supposed to be cut or not considered such as an applicants race, creed, or color the elements which will make affirmative action a success is to embrace the same criteria which were to be ignored or discarded as mentioned earlier. It is now incumbent upon a potential employer to carefully take into consideration the same things like race, creed, or color when evaluating an applicant. This is what is required now by the so-called preferential affirmative action by paying very close attention to the same criteria. These two seemingly contradictory aspects of the affirmative action program can be problematic for those desirous to comply with its provisions and objectives although both two aims aspire for the same return of equality in opportunities. The main problem is whether to use the same set of criteria and then whether to grant compensatory advantages to group members of minorities who were discriminated against. This flies in the face of the ideals of affirmative action which is to allow everybody to compete fairly on an equal footing against everybody else. This implies preference for diversity to enrich everybodys experience but the philosophical debate on this end has